|
Direct and Cross Examination
Description:
Each side gets to interview witnesses to help prove their thesis (make their case). Plaintiff/Prosecution goes first. After each witness undergoes Direct Examination, the opposing side conducts a Cross-Examination, followed, if necessary, by a Re-Direct and a Re-Cross Examination.
Time Limit: Seven minutes per witness.
Purpose: To get information from your own witnesses that helps to prove your thesis; to allow the witness to narrate the facts in support of the case. Any factual areas examined on direct examination may be subject to cross-examination.
Limitations: The function of the attorney is to ask questions, nothing more. Attorneys themselves may not testify or give evidence. Direct questions are intended to lay a foundation for the summary which occurs during the closing statement; therefore, direct questions should not be used to argue a point, but instead to elicit statements that will serve as evidence for the summary.
Procedure for making a Direct Examination:
Prior step - preparation:
Read the case and make the synopsis (facts, evidence, issue statement, relevant law, test, thesis and strategy).
Step One - Review your goal: Start with your summation or thesis (where you want to get to). For example, ask yourself, "What do I want to get out of this witness?" Or, "How does this witness' testimony help prove the thesis/case?" or "What can the witness say that will support your case?"
Step Two - Work your way forward, toward your goal.
Make Direct Questions in accordance with the suggestions listed here. Work with your witness; let them be a part of the process.
Making Direct Questions: Understand what makes a good direct question; the opposing side will raise objections to poor questions and damage the force and integrity of your thesis/case.
Qualities of a good direct question:
Phrased so as to evoke a set of facts from the witness
Asks for observations or feelings, rather than
Within the scope of the witness
Related to the thesis
Builds on prior questions
Lays the groundwork for future, more detailed questions.
Contains only one inquiry per question.
Qualities to Avoid when making a direct (and cross-exam) question:
Leading -suggests an answer to the witness ("Isn't it true you never saw
anything?")
Narrative - goes beyond the facts for which the question was asked.
Speculative - asks the witness to speculate or make guesses.
Outside of the Scope of the Witness - witness affidavit does not give an
answer to that Q.
Argumentative - challenges the witness about his/her inference from the facts,
rather than seeking additional facts (more likely to occur during Cross-
Examination)
Compound - requires the witness to give one answer to a question which
contains two separate inquiries ("You like chocolate and your mother ran
for governor, no?")
(Most judges will permit questions that are compound by definition, but that
do not interfere with the overall process - for example, "State your
name and occupation.")
Asked and Answered - ones which have already been asked and answered.
Hearsay (Questions which ask for hearsay, which is evidence of a statement
made by someone who is not the witness on the stand). "What did Dr. X
say to you at that time?"
Exceptions:
Rule 402 admission against interest of a party or party
opponent
Rule 403 State of Mind
Rule 404 Business Records
Cross Examination
Definition: A chance to ask questions of a witness called by the opposing side; occurs after the other side has conducted its direct examination of a witness.
Time limit: 5 minutes
Purpose: To clarify or cast doubt upon the testimony of opposing witnesses. Inconsistency in stories, bias and other damaging facts may be pointed out to the judge.
Scope: You have more leniency than during Direct Examination (leading questions, etc.), but you may only bring up material covered during the Direct Examination.
Some Advice to Attorneys: You should always know the answer to Cross-Examination questions that you are asking. They should be based on the affidavit, not what the witness thought, felt, etc. Act as if during the cross-examination you are the witness (you are providing the information) and the actual witness is forced to respond simply with a yes or no answer. When the witness vacillates, remind them, "Yes or no please."
|